For
generations the concepts of democracy have been subjects of discussions or
debates among legislators, between people in the academia, and the ordinary citizen
whose living condition was dictated by a retinue of bureaucrats who ruled
according to their whims. Democracy has been so contentious and controversial
and it is to this day, because everyone involved in the discussion employs a
different interpretation that edge toward a political dispensation unique to
his or her thoughts and imaginations. Beginning with the era of the Greeks when
they were the only democratic political power in the world, given their
understanding of legislative dimensions populated by conflicting philosophical
thoughts that was in essence, alien to a compacted world that was struggling to
come up with a political solution, democracy and its concepts or principles has
never had an agreeable unanimous interpretation capable of relieving humanity
from aggravating philosophical quagmires.
According
to Prothro and Grigg (1960), “a successful democracy requires the existence of
a large measure of consensus in society”. However, to political scientists,
there is no general agreement in mind as to the exact proportion of what
constitutes consensus in government.
Conversely, for the purpose of constitutional amendment, three-fourths
is a good measure to reach an accord. Of the many concepts of democracy, the
four unique and guiding principles that I have chosen to highlight are popular
sovereignty, equality, elections, and consensus. The major factor that endears
people to have a democratic government is for the most part for the protection
and promotion of their rights, interests, and welfare. Some important concepts
of modern democracy are democracy, constitutionalism, and liberalism.
Popular
Sovereignty: In popular sovereignty, the people, meaning citizens, are the
ultimate source and authority of government and that it is a fundamental principle
of government.
Equality: Going
by the old adage “no one is above the law”, equality entails equality of
all people before the law regardless of color, creed, religion, sex and gender,
religious and political affiliation, and national origin. In liberal democracy,
even those regarded as minorities have equal right before the law. If there was
no equality in democracy, those enjoying majority rules would govern according
to their wishes and thus trample on the inalienable rights of the minority. Thus,
it is incumbent upon leaders to uphold the law and ensure the equality of all
races and sexes. Stratification and marginalization of a select group of people
is unacceptable in a genuine democracy. Equal sharing of the fruits of the
nation should apply to all citizens. Giving preference to one religion over the
other is undemocratic; likewise, favoring an able-bodied person over a
disabled, in any form, is illegal and subject to prosecution before a court of
law. An era of political unrest known as the civil rights movement, gripped the
U.S.
in the sixties mainly because of inequality of races. Likewise, South Africa
under the apartheid regime saw proliferation of political and civil rights
movements and increased chaos between the white regime and the oppressed black
population.
Free
Elections: Elections alone, without being free, fair, and frequent, do not
fulfill the wishes of the people in electing the government of their choice.
Any liberal democracy that wishes to see proper governance has to have a form
of genuine representation that evolve out of a free, fair, and frequent
electioneering processes by way of the ballot box for the sake of competing and
winning popular votes. “Free elections” is meant to give every citizen the
right to contest and hold office without encumbrances. “Fair elections” imply
fundamentally honest elections that never hinder voters from voting for the
right candidate. “Frequent elections” means that there have to be elections now
and then so that people can have control of the government. In
pseudo-democracies, ruling parties enjoy leverage over the opposition and thus
frequently proclaim unanimous garnering of majority votes in major and minor
elections at times corresponding to 99.99%. Opposition’s fear of government repression
and refusal by the ruling elite to submit to defeat has been harbinger for
continuous manipulation in many election processes where the rule of law is
mandated by dictatorship.
Consensus: A
modern political inclusion or proposition, consensus is a fundamental principle
that is essential to democracy and that it implies unanimity or general
agreement though we are not told the nature and kind of agreement. Political
consensus enables all sides of the political spectrum to agree on an agenda and
reach a unifying solution.
John
Mill appears to have several democratic tenets that he uses to identify
democracy. However, Mill (1860) concurred that Christianity was restricted to Europe and European descendants, a reasonable occurrence
that may have transpired during his lifetime. In the last few centuries, Europe and its descendants took their religion to greater
heights while at the same propagating democracy far and wide. His explanation of individuality as being
equivalent to development makes sense.
Conclusion
The
absence of one democratic concept or principle is cause for democratic failure.
All the concepts/principles of democracy are interdependent and inseparable.
Taking away one concept is like depriving a human being of one his/her senses:
vision, smell, touch, hearing, and so on. Of the many principles of democratic
governance in the world today, liberal democracy towers above others when
rendering developmental services to the cause of humanity. In utilitarianism,
the ideological foundations it cherishes may seem incomprehensible to the wary
human intelligence as it has been “flawed” (Stanford, 2007).
References
Prothro, J.W. & Grigg, C. M. (1960). Fundamental
Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. The Journal of Politics, 22, 276-294.
Mill,
J.S. (1860). On Liberty, Harvard Classics, Vol. 25.
Stanford (2007). Mill’s Moral
and Political Philosophy. Retrieved from
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill-moral-political/.