Partisan Politics
Partisan politics in America has
been gaining ground and growing phenomenally in recent years due to citizen political
independence and disloyalty to party politics. Partisan politics is the cause
of many social divisions and the death of coalitions. It sets a dangerous
precedent when people are divided along socio-economic statuses, religious
denominations, racial belonging, gender and sex, and political and religious affiliation
among other factors. Partisanship in the political arena is more visible in the
Republican Party that has been afflicted by resistance, dissent, and erosion of
political ideals. Unequal distribution of resources, growing influence of
business magnates, proliferation of interest groups, and racial divisions
necessitated the breakup of political bipartisanship.
Political participation and bipartisanship can
be effective tools when it comes to bringing people together to share their
political ideals and hammer out their differences. Carsey and Layman (2006)
contend that partisanship has been perceived by various scholars as
informational and a bulletin that can be used as a shortcut to interpreting
party and issue preferences. It is dangerous when parties get caught up in
gridlocks and fail to steer important national issues. Baker (1984) argues that
republicanism pinpointed the dangers posed by power to the advancement of
liberty and admonished the significance of joining together in unity for the
stability of institutions. With unsolvable colliding political differences
becoming the norm, partisanship, negative policy attitudes, and casual
relationships dissipate from the democratic spectrum. Even among states, there
are visible disproportional distribution of parties with religious, racial,
status and class being the cause.
The decline seen in parties is according to
Hetherington (2001), attributed to political independence. Americans have
become neutral when favoring one party over the other (Hetherington, 2001). Gender
gaps or voting behavior seen among men and women of voting age and noted in
modern political commentaries never existed prior to the election of Ronald
Reagan in 1980 (Kaufmann & Petrocik, 1999). Partisanship emerges when party
leaders, party platforms, and candidates take different directions eventually
leaving party followers in confusion. Political parties are falling into traps
owned by business magnates that have the power to manipulate political settings
of any party. A story is related by Hudson
(2009) of the powerful car magnate and how he was able to stage-manage the town
of Pullman in Illinois . Pullman governed the people and the town
according to his wishes. The same applies to political parties that are
subservient to big corporations. In fact these corporations have a hand in the
alienation of societies and the division of party members. Bickering of party
members and their failure to agree on important national issues is responsible
for the existing partisanship that is degrading the selfless discussions that
would lead to policy formulations. According to Fiorina and Abrams (2008)
literature review of party polarization started a few years ago and that in
2004, a map that appeared after the elections branded red states as ‘Jesusland’
while labeling a combination of blue states with Canada, the ‘United States of
Canada’.
References
Baker, P. (1984). The domestication of politics: Women and
American political society, 1780-1920. The American Historical Review,
Vol. 89, No. 3, 620-647
Carsey, T.M. & Layman, G.C. (2006).
Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences
in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, Vol.
50, No. 2, pp. 464-477
Fiorina, M.P. & Abrams, S.J. (2008). Political polarization in
the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11, pp.
563-588
Hetherington, M.J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role
of elite polarization. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 95,
No. 3
Kaufmann, K.M. & Petrocik, J.R. (1999). The changing politics
of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American
Journal of political Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 864-887
No comments:
Post a Comment