Interest Groups
While interest some groups may exist to alleviate
human suffering, act as vehicles that attract public awareness, and spread the
word of democracy, at times, it is worth restraining their proliferation if
found to be acting in ways that contravene constitutional guidelines. Some
interest groups apply undemocratic means to achieve their objectives while
others uphold the constitution and struggle in ways that make the life of the
ordinary citizen better and comfortable. In the United States , the First Amendment
gives citizens of the nation the right to join organized groups. Federal
legislation can only be used to curtail interest groups only when found to be
harboring signs that may endanger the nation’s security and interests.
In democratic governments, interest groups emerge
mainly when frustrated by strict government regulations. When a government fails
to deliver the right resources to its citizens, its working relationship with
society dissipates. The framers of the constitution basically believed in the
efficacy of restraining interest groups (Macey, 1986). However, that has
changed as modern governments nowadays give preference to select groups of
people driven by self-interests. Coalitions or political groups have become so
widespread such that they have the ability to convince lawmakers to regulate
laws to their favor. When such problems occur, it is prudent to curtail such
groups through federal legislation.
Generally curtailing the influence of all interest
groups through federal legislation is not beneficial to U.S. democracy.
Genuine interest groups that serve the general interests of society can be
quite beneficial. Diamond and Morlino (2004) are of the opinion that denying
interest groups their rights opens the gates to illiberalism, lawlessness, and
abuse of power. A true democracy is one that entertains diffusion of the elite
and popular groups. Political participation, political competition, and
accountability promote fairness and also elevate the political, social, and the
economic status of the ordinary citizen who is governed by democratic laws.
References
Macey,
J.R. (1986). Promoting public-regarding legislation through statutory
interpretation: An interest group model. Columbia
Law Review, Vol. 82, No.
Diamond, L. &
Morlino, L. The quality of democracy. (2004). Journal of Democracy
Volume 15, Number 4.
No comments:
Post a Comment